Skip Navigation

International Journal of Transitional Justice 2009 3(1):1-4; doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijn041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Editorial Note

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

In order to be relevant and credible and to have sustained impact, transitional justice theory and practice must be guided by local needs and local knowledge. While there is much to be celebrated in the creation of international justice mechanisms and the growing global consensus on accountability for human rights abuses, the gains of such processes need to be assessed at the local level. Their contribution to meeting the needs of victims of abuse and local communities and to national political developments will determine whether such mechanisms, theories and policy innovations live up to the claims that have been made on their behalf. IJTJ provides a continuous engagement with these issues.

The contribution of local authors in assessing the role of transitional justice processes is obviously a critical aspect of this endeavour. One important objective of the journal is to seek out local perspectives through articles . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    In Memorium
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?